Dr Julie Ponesse: Nuremberg, Willful Blindness & What We Can Do About It
Dr Julie Ponesse was a professor of ethics at Huron College at the University of Western Ontario. In the fall of 2021, Dr. Ponesse saw her academic career of 20 years fall apart after she refused to comply with her university’s Covid injection mandate. She has a PhD in Philosophy (Western, 2008) with areas of specialization in ethics and ancient philosophy as well as a Masters in Philosophy with Collaborative Specialization in Bioethics from the University of Toronto and a Diploma in Ethics from the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown University.
This is an edited segment from the weekly live General Assembly meeting on August 22, 2022.
This video is also available on Rumble and Odysee.
Here’s what WCH members, staff, and coalition partners are saying about Dr. Ponesse’s presentation:
“So true Julie….!!!! Science and law put into the language of common sense…Thank you..” – Christof Plothe DO
“Thx Dr Ponesse. Excellent insights. Much appreciated.” – Fahrie Hassan
“Thank you so much Julie- very valuable for us at the moment.” – Anne O’Reilly
That was absolutely brilliant, thank you so very much! So enormous what a stand you have taken and how kind and sensitive to those who thought they were doing the right thing. God bless you. My family, all but 1 sibling and his wonderful kids did stand up, the rest all thought they were doing the best they could for everyone else…it is heartbreaking to know how complient people were because the governments lied lied lied, and have for over a century now…thank you so very much.
What an illuminating and brilliantly presented address by Professor Julie Ponesse. I would like to ask you, Dr Lawrie, what has happened to Dr Reinar Fullmich who was collecting evidence to prosecute the main offenders (Gates, Fauci, Hotez etc) in this Worldwide crisis. Was he not attending the 75th Nuremberg Anniversary Seminar, and if he was there did he not speak about his progress?
Regards,
Phil Harrison,
Harare Zimbabwe
The first time I’ve heard and understood the parallels of mass inoculations to the Jews in Europe…moral amnesia. The parable of the camel is a brilliant analogy.
If we have a choice and you say you don’t mean to be harsh, but not eating and not having a place to live when 4 small children relying on you is pretty harsh thing to deal with. I agree with what you have said. But the point I’m referring to is a decision no one should ever be in a position to have make.
It continues to amaze, sorta, how PhDs use-with-abandon the pronoun “we.” Here, Dr. Julie Ponesse deploys that pronoun WRT the Nuremberg Code, and how “we” are guilty of “amnesia.” But when plain spoken people brought up Nuremberg almost TWO YEARS AGO (WRT COVID), and directed that issue straight at the likes of Mr. Anthony Fauci et al.; what was the response from PhDs? Crickets!
“Re-enshrine” (!?) Dr. Ponesse declares this as if she is determined to confirm that it is she and her ilk that are the ones afflicted with . . . amnesia. So be it.
Cornell graduate Anthony Fauci was not the only COVID criminal I directed violation of the Nuremberg Code; I also issued notice to Big Academia, specifically the so-called Ivy League. The response from Ivy League presidents? Crickets. But more insidiously, the response from the deans of the Ivy League law schools? CRICKETS!
Received by all Ivy League presidents, including Martha Pollack the current administrator of Cornell (Fauci’s and my alma mater), my letter of 6 March 2021 I had offered the following:
On Pages 2/3 of 17: “The Verisimilitude of Nuremberg?”
Then, on Pages 4/5 of 17: “American Communist State and the Impossibility of ‘Informed Consent’”
Later, in my letter of 12 April 2021, addressed to Fauci and openly forwarded to all Ivy League law school deans, I had offered the subject:
“Sworn Testimony of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Litigation Involving Nuremberg Code”
On the very first page I stated to Fauci:
“A person that uses taxpayer-funded time on sales & marketing schemes that promote his “vaccine” to children, and also targets by racial group, may not wish to be placed-under-oath, especially regarding his denunciation of these (four) documents: The United States Constitution of July 1789, The Nuremberg Code of August 1947, The Helsinki Declaration of June 1964, The Civil Rights Act of July 1964.”
On Pages 5 thru 15 (ten full pages of 27) of that 12 April 2021 letter I offered:
“COVID-19 “Vaccines,” the Nuremberg Code and the Impossibility of ‘Informed Consent’”
The response from Fauci? Crickets. The response from the Ivy League law schools, the alleged bastions of truth and justice? Not merely CRICKETS, but open derision of my good name.
I could go on . . . but the notion that “we” are suffering from “amnesia” is projectionism at-best. The letters mentioned above and many more (which are strewn with “Nuremberg”) are archived/available here:
http://pvsheridan.com/paulvsheridan-SARS-CoV-2-Letters-Directory/
My most recent letter, to Dr. Jeffrey Hall, might be of interest to those who are aware that African continent nations such as Nigeria, did not submit to the Albert Bourla needle schemes, but instead used proven treatments such as Ivermectin. Nigeria? The nation that the Nache family emigrated from to embrace the so-called “American Dream” (?!) Please go to Pages 36 thru 44 (especially the bottom of page 44) of Letter #30 in the above directory.
By way of further example, the response from the world ‘lifting a finger’ to assist us with the horrors being endured by the Jummai Nache family? CRICKETS!
Dr. Ponesse: Thank you for the video. Do you plan to do a similar video on LIABILITY IMMUNITY?
Ethics? From several decades ago: http://pvsheridan.com/SheridanCornellEthics.pdf
Note that I used the Hopi word “koyaanisqatsi.” And so, here we are!
Another valued presentation. So well thought out and clearly presented. I’ve watched numerous times and share whenever possible. Thank you!
I truly enjoyed the interview with Julie Ponesse.
In the question period at 26 minutes regarding the 20 questions to do with “Bio Ethics Agreement.”
I would be honoured if you could email that document when Julie can find it.
My wife and I are un-VAX Ed but our 2 daughters were and have horrible reactions.
Roger
Hello.
I am surprised that someone like Dr. Ponesse didn’t pick this up:
“The Human Genome as Public: Justifications and Implications” by Michelle J. Bayefsky, in Bioethics, Vol. 31 No. 3 2017
https://thereisnopandemic.net/the-human-genome-as-public-justifications-and-implications-by-michelle-j-bayefsky-in-bioethics-vol-31-no-3-2017/
and use it as a basis to put a stop to mRNA shots.
A legal framework needs to be developed to protect the human genome from exploitation by privateers such as those in Big Pharma, and from destruction by transhumanist lunatics using mRNA injections to kick-start their global “transhuman” project.
There are some treaties in the world intended to protect the genome; not all countries have signed them; it’s doubtful that those who did paid any attention to their signatures when the mRNA mandates were introduced.
Perhaps it’s not too late. The treaties were not enough.
The way to create a legal framework to protect the human genome is through:
1 – domestic law (including constitutional amendments to add protection)
2 – litigation (suing Big Pharma and Gates et als to stop all interventions aimed at altering HUMAN genetic material)
3 – treaties and accords
If governments under the Gates thrall are unlikely to move on the matter, that leaves LITIGATION wide open; and in countries like the USA where many States can pass laws by plebiscite, the people can pass the laws they need to protect the human genome and STOP THE mRNA shots.
This is not merely an issue of “choice”. It’s an issue of saving the human gene pool from sure destruction, and humanity itself from extinction.
I hope that Dr. Ponesse will take an interest in this matter and in the vast realm still open to pass laws and to litigate to stop transhumanism and mRNA injections.
Thank you.
THERE IS NO PANDEMIC
And they are NOT “vaccines”.